Keith Cooper 22.7K subscribers Subscribe 1 No views 1 minute ago Is one of these printer better or. You are getting photo lab quality images here, with fantastic color accuracy and photo quality, but this comes at a steep price. I have had no issues with the Pro 300 at all, other than a shortage of grey and black inks some months ago. It works flawlessly and uses surprisingly little ink. And I am definitively not claiming with my comment that the P700/P900 are better built. You also lose 1 ink and the chroma optimizer with the Pro 200, but otherwise get a printer with similar, if not the same, specs. Where do I find this in Canon? I just can't figure out if one is better than the other (or if I'm looking at completely the wrong thing). I'm really just wondering if anyone has experience with the Canon Imageprograf Pro-300 or the Epson Surecolor P700. The same is true for ink prices a full set of Pro-300 ink is about $120, while the Pro-1000 is over $700. Rather look at the chroma optimiser that reduces bronzing and allows use of all papers. If lower ink capacity is an issue, why not choose the Canon Pro-1000? We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. DxO PureRAW 3 aims to come to their rescue without totally reinventing your workflow! CANONPRO-G1 VS PRO-S1,Comparing ink usage of the Epson P700 or Canon Pro-300- Fotospeed | Paper for Fine Art \u0026 Photography,FINE(MG3630),Super Easy Way To Extract Ink From Large Volume CANON PFI Carts,My \"ULTIMATE\" CANON EF Full Frame Lens Kit,076_2GX . You are not going to get any better print quality than this without going to a dedicated photo lab. Epson Home . You will be getting photo lab quality prints, with exceptional color accuracy for your money essentially professional prints. Have a look at the setup of the Canon and the bit where you print a test page, and then the printer automatically draws the paper back in , scans it ( yes I said scans it ) to calibrate the linearity of the printer ! The Canon printer currently has a retail price of around $1,300 versus $1,200 for the Epson P800. As for resolution: I think it will take an unusual photo (lots of sharp, high-contrast detail) on glossy paper for the P900's 360 ppi to produce visually-better results than the Pro-1000's 300 ppi. The Pixma Pro-100 is now a few years old, meaning the price should be reasonable, but it is actually massively overpriced by resellers, although there is a wide selection of generic ink now available. And one more color can be important. Price: $899.00. The Tango makes a good case to be the best HP printer for home use, with its very compact size, print, copy and scan features, and strong app support and hands-free printing through Alexa. Canon state that the iX6820 only prints up to 28 lb / 105 gsm which is on the low end for greetings cards, although you can probably get away with much heavier paper than this in practice. This long form guide contains a complete workflow for one landscape photo, giving you detailed tips, tricks and guides on how to perfect your landscape photos through digital blending, using the tools in Lightroom and Photoshop, Using targeted white balance adjustments, you can enhance sunrises, paint in new sunsets, make stormy skies pop, create stylised effects, and much more, all with very little time and effort. Jose Rodriguez Photo Printing Techie 58.5K subscribers 12K views 7 months ago CANON PRO 1000 or EPSON SC P 900 Which one should. So that leaves the dot mixing: the P900's using 5760x1440 dpi to print 360x360 ppi means 64 dot-spaces per pixel; the Pro-1000's using 2400x1200 dpi to print 300x300 ppi means 32 dot-spaces per pixel. Download the book on this printer and read about it , you will be amazed. There is a lot of very smart stuff being banded about by people that have marketing degrees Gear what I need to get the job done , after all you don't see mechanics listing their brand. Color/Black: 4800 x 2400 dpi. Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-300 13" Professional Photographic Inkjet Printer . I get far more prints right first time compared with the older Epson that I was replacing. What are the best photo printers for Macs? (Image credit: Canon) I'm in the same boat for some time. Learn a two-and-a-half minute, Photoshop based workflow to fix both colour and tone in this long form tutorial and video series. The real question is: will Canon keep it in production or issue a replacement, the latter of which will/should likely cost closer to $2,000. There really isn't much different that I can see, other than that the Canon Pro-1000, for some reason, is an outlier, in a league of its own. Raist the scan back is not a cleaning function , although in the menu for cleaning the Canon will do all that . Tim then. Dont forget that to ensure your prints come out exactly as you expect, you should be making a printer test image and using a color accurate monitor. My feeling is you have been misguided by a lot of stray comment and wild claims. Its cheaper to print and a more modern/higher tech/resolution design. The quality of the prints is excellent, on glossy, pearl and matt surfaces, including baryta papers. Compared to the previous PRO-10 and PRO-10S, the PRO-300 is slightly smaller and distinctly lighter. MSRP $799.99 $875.97 at. Brand. Obviously this means that color accuracy will be lacking.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'lapseoftheshutter_com-leader-3','ezslot_11',156,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-lapseoftheshutter_com-leader-3-0'); For the highest level of color accuracy, you should be looking at the Canon 6 color photo printers at least, or a model with even more individual color cartridges. Cost-per-print is surprisingly good for a Canon printer, particularly when it comes to color-only printing. https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/63993616. . This doesn't mean the Pro 1000 is a bad printer, but keep in mind the years of distance between these two models. The P700 can print on all types of media up to 13 inches wide, and it was the fastest printer we tested. Nonetheless, for very high volume printing, the ET-2760 is one of your best bets. You therefore see higher print quality with the Pro 200, but at a higher cost of ink, and with a higher cost device. No items to compare. Access to HP instant ink free 5 x 7 photo prints! The Canon and Epson printers produce absolutely incredible images. Canon und Epson professionelles Drucken ohne komplexe Druckertreiber. Lightroom Tutorial Adding Color Depth with White Balance, Photoshop Tutorial Blend Any Two Photos. I have a question about the volume of prints made and how many per month, for instance, might be too many. It weighs just over 14kg (~31 lbs) a noticeable reduction from the ~20kg of the PRO-10S. It's quite something. Ultimately, I prefer the larger format Canons, both for their print quality, but also their ease of use, but really any of the options listed here would make an excellent choice for anyone looking for the best photo printer. With its trays closed, the Pro-300 is notably smaller and lighter than the 2013 Pixma Pro-100: just 7.9 by 15 by 25.2 inches (HWD) and 31.6 pounds. So heard from a know dealer whose name wont be revealed, that yes indeed - he has heard stories with paper feeding on this new generation of Epsons that wasnt quite the case with the p600/800, He said it was hit and miss- ie some instances had the issues, most dont he pinned it to about 1 in 100 but admitted thats just a guesstimate. Canon PFI-300. The blacks in photos actually come out well defined and with surprising depth, so this would make an excellent choice as a black and white photo printer. I have noted in the full reviews which printers are WiFi accessible, and which arent. Been using Epson for over 20 years and got the P700 last year. Thanks so much for answering so quickly! You Pay: $849.00 (110) Add to Cart View Cart. You can find the best options in the article on the best monitors for photo editing. Leica has announced a mono-only version of its M11 60MP manual focus rangefinder. Epson P700 vs Canon PRO-300. This process of ensuring a paper is correctly dealt with by the printer is also available for all your favourite papers during the creation of custom paper settings. I never had an issue to do with my R2880 for alignment. Personally, I still feel the Pro 300 is a better fit for most users, but directly comparing the Canon Pro 200 vs Pro 300, the saving of several hundred dollars can really reduce the difference between them. When thinking about printer brands for the best color accuracy, Canon will always win out in Canon vs HP printers, and Epson will offer better colors in Epson vs HP printers, but in terms of Epson vs Canon printers, the final print tends to look pretty similar as long as you have an Epson or Canon printer, you can be assured of very good color accuracy, and a wide color gamut.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'lapseoftheshutter_com-leader-4','ezslot_12',157,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-lapseoftheshutter_com-leader-4-0'); Small, portable photo printers like the Canon Selphy are often only capable of printing at maximum sizes of 6 x 4, approximately postcard sized and suitable for photo albums or for using in a collage of images for your wall. Go find a " higher tech " Epson that does this . Excuse me, but most of this is totally wrong! However, ink cost is significantly higher. You get good ink life, and relatively cheap generic ink replacement, along with a fast photo printing time and high quality photos, considering the budget nature of this model. If you step up to 'finest details' at 720 or 600 ppi, respectively, then I don't think you'll be able to detect a difference with the naked eye. I say probably because it is difficult to get accurate figures Canon state a very conservative max paper weight to avoid warranty claims. I am talking about the ink formulation, longevity, the resolution- yes, which a couple of reviews pointed out. If your printer only has one color and one black cartridge, you only have to pay for two cartridges to get a full replacement, and can often buy generic ink. This guide covers how to see the Northern Lights when, & where, the ideal camera equipment you should use, the camera settings you need to get perfect photos, and how to process your photos to get something you can be proud of, along with much more. Add to . The printer has to be unchipped like the ET-8550; or be able to take a firmware hack so you can refill cartridges. I also thought it seemed very flimsy and the top cover seemed very prone to scratching, even in the short time I had it. They are literally a drop in a huge swimming pool for inkjet printing. As a long time Epson user, I decided to get the P700 early this year. Add to Wish List Item in Wish List . To be fair, the P900 does have what's to some people the big advantage of being able to use roll-paper. The Pro-1000 should close that gap a bit with its 10 colors on ink versus the P900's 9 colors of ink. You really can't go wrong with either of these models for high-quality 13-inch-wide photo prints. Ink life is relatively good, and you should be able to get a few hundred prints before needing replacements. The Pro-300 beats the Pro-1000, in my opinion, based on two factors: the much lower price, and much lower official ink replacement cost. P700 now takes paper rolls and P900 features a robust, completely enclosed roll feeder (optional, but free!